¶8 The truth is that the surviving Celtic elements were, for the most part, assimilated by Christianity in the Middle Ages;1 the legend of the ‘Holy Grail’, with everything connected to it, is, in this respect, a particularly telling and significant example.2 Moreover, we think that a Western tradition, if it were to be reconstituted, would necessarily take an external religious form, in the strictest sense of this word, and that this form could only be Christian,3 because, on the one hand, the other possible forms have for too long been foreign to the Western mentality, and, on the other hand, it is in Christianity alone, let us say more precisely still in Catholicism,4 that the surviving remnants of the traditional spirit are to be found in the West.5 Any ‘traditionalist’ attempt that disregards this fact is inevitably doomed to failure, because it lacks a base; it is too obvious that one can rely only on what exists effectively, and that, where continuity is lacking, there can only be artificial reconstructions that could not be viable; if it is objected that Christianity itself, in our epoch, is no longer truly understood in its profound sense, we shall reply that it has at least preserved, in its very form, all that is necessary to provide the base in question.6 The least chimerical attempt, the only one even that does not come up against immediate impossibilities, would therefore be that which aimed to restore something comparable to what existed in the Middle Ages, with the differences required by the modification of circumstances;7 and, for everything that is entirely lost in the West, it would be appropriate to appeal to the traditions that have been integrally preserved, as we indicated just now, and then to accomplish a work of adaptation that could only be the task of a strongly constituted intellectual elite.8 All this we have already said; but it is good to insist upon it again, because too many inconsistent daydreams are currently being given free rein, and also because it must be well understood that, if the Eastern traditions, in their own forms, can certainly be assimilated by an elite which, by definition as it were, must be beyond all forms,9 they can probably never be, barring unforeseen transformations, by the generality of Westerners, for whom they were not made.10 If a Western elite succeeds in forming itself, the true knowledge of Eastern doctrines, for the reason we have just indicated, will be indispensable to it for fulfilling its function; but those who will only have to reap the benefit of its work, and who will be the great majority, may very well have no awareness of these things, and the influence they will receive from them, so to speak without suspecting it and in any case by means that will entirely elude them, will be none the less real or effective for that. We have never said anything else; but we have thought it necessary to repeat it here as clearly as possible, because, if we must expect not always to be entirely understood by everyone, we at least wish not to have intentions attributed to us that are in no way our own.
←
→
intellecthierarchy

Summary

Guénon explains that the surviving Celtic elements were largely assimilated by Christianity in the Middle Ages, as shown by the legend of the Holy Grail. If a Western tradition were to be reconstituted, it would necessarily take a Christian form, because the only surviving remnants of the traditional spirit in the West are found in Catholicism. Any traditionalist attempt ignoring this fact is doomed to failure. The least chimerical approach would be to restore something comparable to the Middle Ages, appealing to integrally preserved Eastern traditions for what is lost in the West, through the work of a strongly constituted intellectual elite. Eastern traditions can be assimilated by a Western elite, but probably never by the generality of Westerners. Guénon clarifies that he has never said otherwise, and repeats these points to avoid having intentions attributed to him that are not his own.

General notes

  1. assimilés par le Christianisme — Rendered as ‘assimilated by Christianity’. By this Guénon means that the medieval Church integrated into its liturgy, its architectural symbolism and its hagiographic legends many motifs derived from the pre-Christian Celtic heritage. This assimilation was not a simple pagan destruction but a genuine ‘recapitulation’ (assimilatio) in the scholastic sense: a transposition of authentic traditional elements into a new Christian doctrinal framework, without loss of their original symbolic value. The most striking example is that of standing stones (menhirs) Christianised by the erection of crosses or chapels on their summits, or again that of Celtic sacred fountains become sites of Marian pilgrimage. ↩︎
  2. la légende du « Saint Graal » — Rendered as ‘the legend of the “Holy Grail”’. Guénon devotes several studies to the Grail in The King of the World (1927) and in later articles. For him, the Arthurian legend (Chrétien de Troyes, Robert de Boron, Wolfram von Eschenbach) contains Celtic elements (the magical cauldron of Dagda, the spear of Lug) and Eastern elements (the influence of Syriac Christianity or Manichaeism). The Graal itself symbolises the ‘Heart of the World’ or the supreme spiritual centre, identified with the ‘Holy Chalice’ of the Last Supper but also with the alchemical ‘Philosopher’s Stone’. This fusion shows how a secondary tradition (Celtic) can be ‘taken up’ (assumed) by a higher form (Christian) without losing its evocative power. Guénon contrasts this natural assimilation with the artificial pseudo-restorations of modern ‘Celtism’. ↩︎
  3. une forme extérieure religieuse […] chrétienne — Rendered as ‘an external religious form […] Christian’. Guénon here distinguishes ‘esotericism’ (internal, initiatic) from ‘exotericism’ (external, religious, social). To be viable, any tradition must be embodied in an external form adapted to the mentality of a people and an epoch. In the West, this exoteric form can only be Christian today, because the other possible forms (Greek, Roman, Celtic) have been dead for too long. Guénon specifies that this concerns only the majority of Westerners (the generality); the elite, by contrast, can rise above forms. It is therefore not an ‘exclusivist Christianity’ but a factual historical and psychological observation. ↩︎
  4. le Catholicisme — Rendered as ‘Catholicism’. Guénon, although critical of certain modern deviations of the Roman Church (especially after the Council of Trent and Pius IX’s Syllabus of Errors), recognises that Catholicism has preserved, better than Protestantism, the elements necessary for a traditional restoration: a hierarchical priesthood, a symbolic liturgy, a sacramental practice, a patristic and scholastic tradition, as well as the possibility of a Christian esotericism (above all among the great Rhenish mystics, the Spiritual Franciscans, and certain Catholic Masonic currents). Protestantism, by contrast, broke with the very notion of initiatic transmission and sacerdotal hierarchy, which renders it unfit to serve as a basis for a traditional renaissance. Guénon specifies ‘Catholicism’ rather than ‘Christianity’ to designate this precise institutional form, without prejudging the spiritual validity of the Eastern Orthodox Churches (which he respects but whose influence in the West is too weak). ↩︎
  5. les restes d’esprit traditionnel qui survivent encore — Rendered as ‘the surviving remnants of the traditional spirit that still survive’. These ‘remnants’ are for Guénon: the Latin liturgy (especially the Tridentine missal), Thomist scholasticism (read as a metaphysics and not as a mere rational system), Gothic art (cathedral symbolism), certain craft and military confraternities (regular Freemasonry, chivalry), and above all the survival of an underground Christian esotericism (spiritual alchemy, authentic Rosicrucianism, certain branches of Pelagianism and semi-Pelagianism). These remnants are ‘surviving’ (survivants), not ‘living’ in the full sense: they subsist in a state of ruins or fragments, but sufficiently to serve as a support for a restitutio if revivified by contact with the still integral Eastern traditions. ↩︎
  6. il a du moins gardé, dans sa forme même, tout ce qui est nécessaire — Rendered as ‘it has at least preserved, in its very form, all that is necessary’. Guénon distinguishes between the effective understanding of a tradition by the masses (which may be nil) and the objective existence of its external form (rites, dogmas, institutions). Even if the majority of Catholics no longer understand the profound meaning of liturgical symbols, the liturgy itself, the Creed, the sacraments and the sacerdotal order constitute a formal ‘deposit’ that can be reactivated by an elite. The form subsists like a skeleton awaiting only the soul to revivify it. This is why Guénon insists on the necessity of relying on an existing form (Catholicism) rather than inventing a new one (Neo-Druidism, Neo-Paganism, etc.). ↩︎
  7. les différences requises par la modification des circonstances — Rendered as ‘the differences required by the modification of circumstances’. Guénon rejects any literal ‘return’ to the Middle Ages, because the cosmic and historical conditions have changed (humanity has entered more deeply into the Kali-Yuga). A restoration can only be analogical, not identical: it must take up the timeless principles of the medieval tradition (hierarchy, symbolism, initiation) but adapt them to the reduced possibilities of the modern epoch. For example, sacred royalty can no longer be restored politically, but only as a spiritual function within an elite. Guénon speaks of ‘required differences’ and not of abandoning the medieval ideal. ↩︎
  8. une élite intellectuelle fortement constituée — Rendered as ‘a strongly constituted intellectual elite’. The ‘intellectual elite’ in Guénon is not a group of academics or intellectuals in the modern sense, but a spiritual (initiatic) elite possessing direct metaphysical knowledge (jñāna). It must be ‘strongly constituted’, that is, organised according to a rigorous hierarchy (distinction of degrees of initiation) and possess a coherent doctrine, a method of transmission and an effective spiritual centre. This elite would be the equivalent, for a restored West, of what the Druids were for the Celts, the Brahmans for India, or the Sufis for Islam. Its ‘work of adaptation’ consists in transposing the universal principles of Eastern traditions into forms comprehensible to the West, without altering them. ↩︎
  9. au-delà de toutes les formes — Rendered as ‘beyond all forms’. The spiritual elite, by its metaphysical realisation, transcends any particular religious or cultural form. He who has attained knowledge of the Supreme Principle (Brahman, Allāh, the Tao) is no longer bound by the conditions of a particular tradition, even if he continues outwardly to observe his form of belonging (exotericism) out of respect for the cosmic law (dharma). This ‘transcendence of forms’ allows the elite to assimilate directly the Eastern doctrines in their metaphysical purity, without passing through exoteric adaptation. Guénon here takes up the classical distinction between ḥaqīqah (inner truth) and sharī‘ah (outer law) in Sufism. ↩︎
  10. pour qui elles n’ont point été faites — Rendered as ‘for whom they were not made’. The Eastern forms (Hindu rites, Islamic prayers, Chinese ceremonies) are adapted to specific collective mentalities, formed by millennia of history and cultural conditioning. To transplant them as they are into the West would be to impose tailor-made garments on bodies of a different morphology: this can only produce an artificial syncretism or a salon exoticism. Guénon thus opposes both academic ‘Orientalism’ (which studies the East as a museum) and ‘smuggled Hinduism’ (Westerners imitating Indian customs without understanding their spirit). The Eastern forms are for the elite (who transcends them), not for the Western mass. ↩︎